The claims that are being made about what is possible via this type of surveillance are in fact not grounded in reality. Artificial intelligence - whatever you have been led to believe by the marketing of these companies - is not in fact capable of magic. I think we need to be very clear that there’s no way to implement a safe backdoor. There is a vein of magical thinking that is claiming that technologies like client-side scanning will somehow be able to surveil everyone’s communications on behalf of the government and some mixture of private entities determine whether those communications are considered acceptable or not, and take action on that determination. What do you mean when you say, “clarify the terms”? It’s really important that we continue to clarify the terms and continue to ultimately win on this, or we could be facing a scenario where the possibility for private digital communications is all but curtailed.
But right now I think we’re in a pretty significant moment. The will to centralize power has come with the kind of will to manage, surveil, socially control populations, and I don’t think that kind of nucleus is going away. We’re not going to convince those in power that they should give up their pursuit of information asymmetry as a tool of power, which is effectively what surveillance generates for those who surveil over those who are surveilled. Because what we’re dealing with is not a misunderstanding of how technology works, at least it is not based on a misunderstanding. Now, I don’t think if we’re going to frame this as a war, I don’t think it’s a war we’re ever going to definitively win. And I think it is necessary that we push back and clarify the terms. In my time, I have not seen a greater threat. The threat is very real and very immediate. How would you describe the moment we’re in? Some people say we’re entering another stage of the encryption wars. This conversation has been edited for clarity and length. CyberScoop spoke with Whittaker about global threats to encryption and how AI may be fueling “magical thinking” about how governments are trying to evade encrypted technologies. The bill would introduce client-side scanning, a technology that scans people’s private communications on their devices to match against a database of content considered objectionable.Ī prominent artificial intelligence researcher who formerly worked at Google before helping co-found the AI Now research institute, Whittaker is also a leading voice in warning about the technology’s potential harms to civil liberties. Online Safety Bill, which is expected to soon reach a final vote. Recently, Signal joined critics including Meta to call for changes to the U.K. And lately, there’s been no shortage of risks. Tasked with overseeing a staff of a little over 40 at the small nonprofit that keeps the app running, Signal President Meredith Whittaker is the company’s voice when it comes to fighting against policies that threaten users’ privacy. As a result, it’s also become a target of lawmakers seeking to undermine the technology. With tens of millions of users around the globe, Signal is one of the leading messaging apps offering encryption to protect messages from snoops.
0 kommentar(er)
